Our moto:

  • Budget audio for budget people

Our Goal:

  • To make sure starving artists know which gear to buy instead of bread.

Categories:

Calendar

September 2010
M T W T F S S
« Dec    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  


A comparison of various lossy compression formats at highest quality

August 24th, 2007 by ScottyP

This was to settle an argument, but you might find it useful

lossy compression

Click on the thumbnail for the full resolution version.

The verdict: OGG wins again. at 1.0 quality, it is roughly 1/3 the original file size, yet maintains pretty much all the spectral information intact. I used default settings for everything, with no special options, and always highest quality settings. I included 128 kbit MP3 as a comparison. The vertical runs from 0hz to 22khz. Except for the 128kbit mp3, most of the audio information missing is not in the human audible range (it is mostly past 18khz).

Posted in Articles | 4 Comments »

socialize this

4 Responses

  1. Vincent Says:

    What do the x and y axis represent?

  2. ScottyP Says:

    time on the horizontal, frequency response on the vertical.

  3. Thomas Patrick Hughson Says:

    what about flac?

  4. ff45t1z Says:

    .FLAC remains pretty much lossless, it’s the way to go for digital storage of CDs. Though certainly not for streaming or distributing, heh.
    These results don’t surprise me one bit really. More companies should use .OGG these days, we live in the megacorp age and more people and companies should reject the patents on the MP3 format. It’s long been superseded.

Leave a Comment

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.